but
she could beat BUSH.
maybe not the next guy in '08,
but as weak as kerry is
and pulling 48%
hillary would win,
That's very much the Clinton Plan - however, not the first section. If she could beat Bush, then she would have run against him. She does not think she can beat him, and also knows if she gets trounced like Kerry is going to, she wouldn't get the title shot in 2008. Because, in 2008, she doesn't have to compete with The Dynasty. Unless Cheney runs. Now THAT would be funny.
not out of the gate even
and already called
hitler.
I always wonder who people compared bad people to BEFORE Hitler, you know? I mean, who used to be the top douchebag before Hitler took it? Maybe Hillary's not as bad as Hitler...maybe she'll be like the other guy...
Kinda silly for people to say they would vote for Hillary just because she is a woman.
For real. As a general rule, single women do not vote (hell, most young people don't vote, period), and most married women vote with their husbands - that is also a pretty silly thing to do, if you ask me, but I don't think they'll swing for Hilary just because she's a woman. This is only because, when I talk to women that don't vote alongside their husbands, they are some very politically-minded women who verymuch know their shit, and aren't going to vote for someone just based on sex. Most would be offended at that insinuation, too. I think you would have an easier time saying if Al Sharpton ran, he would get a minority swing vote. But, once again, minorities have less of a voting rate than the old rich white people (and those old rich white people are old and rich, so they now lots of people that do what they say).
vote for a man they don't like [kerry]
just to defeat bush.
Yeah, dude, this is the first presidential election I can vote in, and look at my choices! I can't NOT VOTE, what am I gonna' do? I don't want either one, but I know one has to win...
(Message edited by taoistshredder on June 26, 2004)