[jbaggs1]

People are responsible for educating themselves. Unfortunately there is not a bullshit sign next to what is in print, or a flashing symbol on the television, or a tone on the radio the signals when bullshit is passed off as intelligent conversation. Definitions of truth are meaningless, not just in politics but in everything. If a person believes something is truth then it's truth.
Plans for the takeover of all regions of the world are contemplated by the war mongers of the pentagon. Is this true or is it bullshit? I've never worked in the section of the pentagon that does the planning. Should I believe this crap because it came from a reliable source. What source and what agenda does this source have? The Bush administation made plans for Irag's oil before 9/11. So What? It didn't change what happened on 9/11. Of course there was conflicting plans. If there wasn't it wouldn't make good print but at the moment that is of no concern. In this article it quotes what "insurgents" say. This is total bullshit. How did the writer of this article get this supposedly true info. Did they ask everyone who is classified as an insurgent (who does the classification?) what thier opinion was. How do we know that this Aljibury is a truthful person or if he is a real person what is his agenda? We all know that if it's printed of broadcast on Tv or the radio it must be the truth. Of course this should have a bullshit marker next to it because I don't know what the hell I'm talking about!!! And that's the truth.