| I wouldn't dismiss most of the public as having 'primitive minds'. There are plenty of irrational people out there but some people that disagree with this technology have undoubtedly thought it out and weighed the pro's and con's. It seems like most of the objections to it are on ethical grounds. Many of those arguments are religious in nature but not all of them. Either way, these people are probably more intelligent than you are giving them credit for. Their thoughts could be just as logical as someone who favors the technology; their starting assumptions are just different.
__________________
"That which does not kill us makes us stranger" |