| Just look for the peer-reviews. Another thing, the writer of this article would have any information (and more) on the subject than you could come up with, and would not have simply cited something untrue or even questionable without saying that it is questionable (as the author does with a lot of the earlier research done in the field). It sounds as though you are talking about a seperate incedence entirely. Just in the interest of saving you time, I would just take the article's (and the two articles that it cites) word. This is not the mass media; there is clearly no bias. Also if you notice in the abstract that I posted, it is from the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute; the article is merely recording what happened. Why would someone from an eye institute make up a story when his credibility and thus career is at stake?
Hallucinogens rarely have bad consequences, but it does happen. There is no reason to try to disprove one case cited by credible sources.
Take er easy
__________________
Sunshine daydream
Walk you the tall trees
Going where the wind goes
Blooming like a red rose
Breathing more freely... |